<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madonna/Whore Complexes, Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/</link>
	<description>human nature and sexual politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabian</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-5476</link>
		<dc:creator>fabian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-5476</guid>
		<description>nice way to end the post but how shall i put this. much of our world was shaped in colonial europe to understand the madonna whore complex we need understand the history of male female relationships in colonial europe. it is thinking such as this that lets me know that it will be hard to break the colonial stamp that europe has placed on the world. please send me your email i have 2 articles i wrote that you should read regarding relationships. one is titled the demand and supply of sex, the other is called why no woman loves you. as a matter of fact i will send you a copy of esther vilars 2 books which chinweizu got a lot from. my email is gasdemup?yahoo.com also yes as i got older i realised that my moms aint perfect i even told her that the only honest women are ex strippers and prostitutes because they tell you what they are upfront. the only problem is you cant turn a hoe into a house wife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice way to end the post but how shall i put this. much of our world was shaped in colonial europe to understand the madonna whore complex we need understand the history of male female relationships in colonial europe. it is thinking such as this that lets me know that it will be hard to break the colonial stamp that europe has placed on the world. please send me your email i have 2 articles i wrote that you should read regarding relationships. one is titled the demand and supply of sex, the other is called why no woman loves you. as a matter of fact i will send you a copy of esther vilars 2 books which chinweizu got a lot from. my email is gasdemup?yahoo.com also yes as i got older i realised that my moms aint perfect i even told her that the only honest women are ex strippers and prostitutes because they tell you what they are upfront. the only problem is you cant turn a hoe into a house wife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedpoleQ</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-4455</link>
		<dc:creator>RedpoleQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-4455</guid>
		<description>I think a good father&#039;s primary role is to teach about the whore side of the dichotomy and when and how to push back against feminine power ie how to wield masculine power effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a good father&#8217;s primary role is to teach about the whore side of the dichotomy and when and how to push back against feminine power ie how to wield masculine power effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3872</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3872</guid>
		<description>There are lots of good points. If the arguments begin from a psychosexual string, it stays close to the points and follows a good corollary logic. However like the book Freakonomics, the points are very correlative in nature. The pursuit of idealism in terms of heroism for self sacrifice etc is truly designed for men to attain individual martyrdom where as women&#039;s contributions historically have been lumped into their archetype yet generalized role of wife, mother, daughter, sister etc. Granted these roles demand the need for valor, sacrifice and other heroic attributes, those same attributes are expected to protect land, political power, financial gain etc. Hence the trait so vividly described to be found in men as kids is truly a manifestation of all these other components and pursuits as well that are granted to men as their domain. The best upside once again results in the individual patriarchal name that carries on beyond their lives and establishes a distinct greatness which is an acceptable trade off for many. The desire to excel and to dominate other men, to combat, to capture, etc still fall short of the sphere that encompasses and drives the male psyche. In conclusion, the pursuit of women becomes a more male driven endeavor. Another &quot;game&quot; that they have to win to impress their male cohort. It remains a strong pursuit up to their adulthood until a mutual compromise is reached to limit the battlefronts of such pursuit. They all reach a mutual contract to reduce the threat levels to leave certain components of competitive conquest a null factor. This ensures they can work together on most things and sharpen their attacks to secure a win to a more focalized territory during times of contention. A single womanizer within a fabric of well meshed male dominated industry typically signals threat and creates instability that does not go unpunished. Eventually most men settle for the trade off of setting their female pursuit aside so they can focus on more important pursuits: wealth, personal legacy, power, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of good points. If the arguments begin from a psychosexual string, it stays close to the points and follows a good corollary logic. However like the book Freakonomics, the points are very correlative in nature. The pursuit of idealism in terms of heroism for self sacrifice etc is truly designed for men to attain individual martyrdom where as women&#8217;s contributions historically have been lumped into their archetype yet generalized role of wife, mother, daughter, sister etc. Granted these roles demand the need for valor, sacrifice and other heroic attributes, those same attributes are expected to protect land, political power, financial gain etc. Hence the trait so vividly described to be found in men as kids is truly a manifestation of all these other components and pursuits as well that are granted to men as their domain. The best upside once again results in the individual patriarchal name that carries on beyond their lives and establishes a distinct greatness which is an acceptable trade off for many. The desire to excel and to dominate other men, to combat, to capture, etc still fall short of the sphere that encompasses and drives the male psyche. In conclusion, the pursuit of women becomes a more male driven endeavor. Another &#8220;game&#8221; that they have to win to impress their male cohort. It remains a strong pursuit up to their adulthood until a mutual compromise is reached to limit the battlefronts of such pursuit. They all reach a mutual contract to reduce the threat levels to leave certain components of competitive conquest a null factor. This ensures they can work together on most things and sharpen their attacks to secure a win to a more focalized territory during times of contention. A single womanizer within a fabric of well meshed male dominated industry typically signals threat and creates instability that does not go unpunished. Eventually most men settle for the trade off of setting their female pursuit aside so they can focus on more important pursuits: wealth, personal legacy, power, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missh</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3841</link>
		<dc:creator>Missh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3841</guid>
		<description>I read all 3 parts in one go...fascinating!  I&#039;m starting to understand my eff&#039;d up late bloomer friend a lot better.  He talks about his mother on occaision but never his father, who is still present in his life.  I haven&#039;t read the other articles yet, but am very interested in understanding how fathers shape a man&#039;s personality, since more often we hear how his personality is affected by lack of a father figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read all 3 parts in one go&#8230;fascinating!  I&#8217;m starting to understand my eff&#8217;d up late bloomer friend a lot better.  He talks about his mother on occaision but never his father, who is still present in his life.  I haven&#8217;t read the other articles yet, but am very interested in understanding how fathers shape a man&#8217;s personality, since more often we hear how his personality is affected by lack of a father figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desi Kama Sutra Queen Female Pick Up Artist</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3552</link>
		<dc:creator>Desi Kama Sutra Queen Female Pick Up Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3552</guid>
		<description>Aw man, now y&#039;all are dissin&#039; yo mammas as well?

That&#039;s low O, that&#039;s really low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw man, now y&#8217;all are dissin&#8217; yo mammas as well?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s low O, that&#8217;s really low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Raine</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Raine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>Ricky Raw--

I was more commenting on some of the lists the posters here made about women.  One thing that IS great about Feminism is that men have a better chance of knowing that their woman is with them because they WANT to be not because they NEED to be.  It has also provided a larger variety of &quot;types of women&quot; than the old ways.  Women don&#039;t have to like certain things anymore and neither do men.  Those are the bonuses.

However, I am not a fan of women that think being &quot;equal&quot; to men means being &quot;the same&quot;.  People argue that that is the meaning of the word, but it&#039;s not in the way we apply it.  There are a lot of things about Feminism and female power that are great, but there are a lot of things that are not.

I think a woman needs to realize that she can be feminine and girly and STILL fit in with the guys.... there is a nice medium, but a lot of women don&#039;t apply it and go off the deep end one way or another (as do men).

Also, this crap I read from hardcore feminists about a Utopia without men is appalling to me.  I cannot imagine living in a world where I had to get along with just women.  I&#039;d be the very first suicide in THAT utopia.  I agree with you that bitterness only punishes the person who feels bitter, not the people on the receiving end of that.  I like your posts, they seem fair most of the time and show an open mind.  I don&#039;t want you to think I was ragging on your post (I was mostly ragging on the guys who are dissing women in the same way that women diss THEM.)

Not all men are sex crazed, spitting, farting, idiots and not all women are power hungry vampires.  A gender battle is one that will never be won!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky Raw&#8211;</p>
<p>I was more commenting on some of the lists the posters here made about women.  One thing that IS great about Feminism is that men have a better chance of knowing that their woman is with them because they WANT to be not because they NEED to be.  It has also provided a larger variety of &#8220;types of women&#8221; than the old ways.  Women don&#8217;t have to like certain things anymore and neither do men.  Those are the bonuses.</p>
<p>However, I am not a fan of women that think being &#8220;equal&#8221; to men means being &#8220;the same&#8221;.  People argue that that is the meaning of the word, but it&#8217;s not in the way we apply it.  There are a lot of things about Feminism and female power that are great, but there are a lot of things that are not.</p>
<p>I think a woman needs to realize that she can be feminine and girly and STILL fit in with the guys&#8230;. there is a nice medium, but a lot of women don&#8217;t apply it and go off the deep end one way or another (as do men).</p>
<p>Also, this crap I read from hardcore feminists about a Utopia without men is appalling to me.  I cannot imagine living in a world where I had to get along with just women.  I&#8217;d be the very first suicide in THAT utopia.  I agree with you that bitterness only punishes the person who feels bitter, not the people on the receiving end of that.  I like your posts, they seem fair most of the time and show an open mind.  I don&#8217;t want you to think I was ragging on your post (I was mostly ragging on the guys who are dissing women in the same way that women diss THEM.)</p>
<p>Not all men are sex crazed, spitting, farting, idiots and not all women are power hungry vampires.  A gender battle is one that will never be won!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. AKA Ricky Raw</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3466</link>
		<dc:creator>T. AKA Ricky Raw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3466</guid>
		<description>Lady Raine,

I&#039;m actually not encouraging bitterness, I&#039;m encouraging understanding.  I think it&#039;s important for men to reconsider what they view as power and understand that women exercise power in ways we don&#039;t grasp.  I don&#039;t want to encourage hating women.  If anything, this book actually humbled me as a man and made me realize how much I underestimated women in the past simply because I was analyzing them by the standards of male power.

Regardless of whether the author&#039;s tone is overly hateful, and I leave that determination to the individual readers to decide for themselves, he does make great points that I think both men and women need to hear.  For example women thanks to feminism are giving up a lot of things that actually give them power in exchange for chasing traditionally male avenues of power that make them unhappy in the long run and don&#039;t attract men either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lady Raine,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually not encouraging bitterness, I&#8217;m encouraging understanding.  I think it&#8217;s important for men to reconsider what they view as power and understand that women exercise power in ways we don&#8217;t grasp.  I don&#8217;t want to encourage hating women.  If anything, this book actually humbled me as a man and made me realize how much I underestimated women in the past simply because I was analyzing them by the standards of male power.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether the author&#8217;s tone is overly hateful, and I leave that determination to the individual readers to decide for themselves, he does make great points that I think both men and women need to hear.  For example women thanks to feminism are giving up a lot of things that actually give them power in exchange for chasing traditionally male avenues of power that make them unhappy in the long run and don&#8217;t attract men either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Raine</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3465</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Raine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3465</guid>
		<description>Kitchen power?  Holy crap!  I can honestly say the only thing powerful about my kitchen is that my computer is up there.  I think the writer has a lot of good points about how things came to be this way and such, but such a long list of horrible things about women???

Hating on women NEVER gives you any success with the ladies either WITH or without game.  You forgot to mention women&#039;s uncanny ability to sense things like that.  It&#039;s important.  A man&#039;s looks do him no good if he has a defeatist attitude and seeing women as the &quot;enemy&quot; is a defeatist attitude that goes nowhere.

Reading this should make men realize that women are &quot;pushed&quot; to be a certain way just as much as men are.  They are molded throughout life and usually either stick to it, or rebel wildly.... men are much the same.  So why does everyone keep blaming the opposite gender for the way things are.

One thing I see men regularly getting hateful about is women&#039;s power in the sexual/dating world.  Basically they&#039;re pissed that we were born with the ability to give birth.  It amazes me when men see this as a &quot;feminine evil power&quot;.  They seem to be unaware that women have no choice in the matter, either and that hating them for that is the equivalent of yelling at God or shaking your fist at the sky.

All that bitterness and hate is better cast aside.  Every woman is different and most don&#039;t fall into the categories I see above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kitchen power?  Holy crap!  I can honestly say the only thing powerful about my kitchen is that my computer is up there.  I think the writer has a lot of good points about how things came to be this way and such, but such a long list of horrible things about women???</p>
<p>Hating on women NEVER gives you any success with the ladies either WITH or without game.  You forgot to mention women&#8217;s uncanny ability to sense things like that.  It&#8217;s important.  A man&#8217;s looks do him no good if he has a defeatist attitude and seeing women as the &#8220;enemy&#8221; is a defeatist attitude that goes nowhere.</p>
<p>Reading this should make men realize that women are &#8220;pushed&#8221; to be a certain way just as much as men are.  They are molded throughout life and usually either stick to it, or rebel wildly&#8230;. men are much the same.  So why does everyone keep blaming the opposite gender for the way things are.</p>
<p>One thing I see men regularly getting hateful about is women&#8217;s power in the sexual/dating world.  Basically they&#8217;re pissed that we were born with the ability to give birth.  It amazes me when men see this as a &#8220;feminine evil power&#8221;.  They seem to be unaware that women have no choice in the matter, either and that hating them for that is the equivalent of yelling at God or shaking your fist at the sky.</p>
<p>All that bitterness and hate is better cast aside.  Every woman is different and most don&#8217;t fall into the categories I see above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someone</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3455</link>
		<dc:creator>someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3455</guid>
		<description>The Madonna/Whore Complex describes me very well. I am only attracted to virtuous and pure women, even to the point of not wanting them to be too interested in sex. That&#039;s simply my preference, and I don&#039;t see it as a problem. However, I am also not delusional enough to think that there actually exist any women who are not only virtuous and pure but also meet all my other criteria.

I had some negative experiences with my mother when I was little, and did not regard her as infallible, so my &quot;complex&quot; must have come from somewhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Madonna/Whore Complex describes me very well. I am only attracted to virtuous and pure women, even to the point of not wanting them to be too interested in sex. That&#8217;s simply my preference, and I don&#8217;t see it as a problem. However, I am also not delusional enough to think that there actually exist any women who are not only virtuous and pure but also meet all my other criteria.</p>
<p>I had some negative experiences with my mother when I was little, and did not regard her as infallible, so my &#8220;complex&#8221; must have come from somewhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Rostrom</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3048</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Rostrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 06:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3048</guid>
		<description>IMO the Madonna/Whore dichotomy is rooted in evolutionary psychology. It represents two competing reproductive strategies: high-value and low-cost.

In the high-value strategy, the male pursues the sort of female who represents a high probability of producing offspring (the Madonna). Young, virginal/chaste, and so on. Such females are costly, in terms of effort to achieve sexual access. The male often has to commit a lifetime of support (i.e. marriage); though this is of benefit to his offspring by that female. 

In the low-cost strategy, the male pursues females whose probabilty of producing the male&#039;s offspring is low, but whose cost of access is also very low (the Whore).

Either strategy can be successful. There is evidence that each strategy is most successful when the majority of males follows the &lt;i&gt;other&lt;/i&gt; strategy.

Males have sexual instincts which push them to follow these strategies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO the Madonna/Whore dichotomy is rooted in evolutionary psychology. It represents two competing reproductive strategies: high-value and low-cost.</p>
<p>In the high-value strategy, the male pursues the sort of female who represents a high probability of producing offspring (the Madonna). Young, virginal/chaste, and so on. Such females are costly, in terms of effort to achieve sexual access. The male often has to commit a lifetime of support (i.e. marriage); though this is of benefit to his offspring by that female. </p>
<p>In the low-cost strategy, the male pursues females whose probabilty of producing the male&#8217;s offspring is low, but whose cost of access is also very low (the Whore).</p>
<p>Either strategy can be successful. There is evidence that each strategy is most successful when the majority of males follows the <i>other</i> strategy.</p>
<p>Males have sexual instincts which push them to follow these strategies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphadominance</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3042</link>
		<dc:creator>alphadominance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3042</guid>
		<description>TurkishThought,

Except for the sexual components, you could just as well be describing children.  I came to this realization and am a proponent of the view that one should view both as behaving similarly given the emotional basis for their decision making.  Other than the sexual component of the relationship, one&#039;s approach to both should be the same.  This is the fundamental basis for behaving as the patriarch.  A patriarch doesn&#039;t engage in argument with emotional beings.  A patriarch doesn&#039;t seek validation from them.  He doesn&#039;t reason with them.  He doesn&#039;t explain himself to them.  He doesn&#039;t let them control him or tell him what to do.  When a man realizes this and takes the lead, everything else falls into place.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;alphadominances last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://alphadominance.com/?p=958&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nietzsche on the nature of women&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TurkishThought,</p>
<p>Except for the sexual components, you could just as well be describing children.  I came to this realization and am a proponent of the view that one should view both as behaving similarly given the emotional basis for their decision making.  Other than the sexual component of the relationship, one&#8217;s approach to both should be the same.  This is the fundamental basis for behaving as the patriarch.  A patriarch doesn&#8217;t engage in argument with emotional beings.  A patriarch doesn&#8217;t seek validation from them.  He doesn&#8217;t reason with them.  He doesn&#8217;t explain himself to them.  He doesn&#8217;t let them control him or tell him what to do.  When a man realizes this and takes the lead, everything else falls into place.</p>
<p><abbr><em>alphadominances last blog post..<a href="http://alphadominance.com/?p=958" rel="nofollow">Nietzsche on the nature of women</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TurkishThought</title>
		<link>http://therawness.com/madonnawhore-complexes-part-3/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>TurkishThought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therawness.com/?p=546#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>The below list just about describes my ex-wife and new wife to a tee. What they feel is more important than facts...

Women are flaky and unreliable. 
Women are emotional and illogical. 
Women only live in the emotion of the moment, do what feels good at the time, and justify their actions to themselves after the fact. 
Women are manipulative and use guys for free drinks and dinners. 
Women are fickle and have short attention spans. 
Women are self-centered and self-interested. 
Women primarily go to clubs for attention and validation from men. 
Women constantly test men, try to devalue them, and try to make them jump through hoops. 
Women try to make men suck up to them and put them on a pedestal. 
Women think their pussies are made of gold and sell them to the highest bidder. 
Women don’t know what they really want. 
Women are confused and hypocritical. They’ll profess to dislike whorish behavior then blow a guy in a bathroom that night. 
Women are programmed to want to get knocked up by an Alpha Male then ensnare an unwitting Beta Male into raising the child for her. 
Women will cheat on their partners coldly and unemotionally. 
Women are slaves to how their friends and society sees them. They want to sleep around, but have to be discrete about it. 
Society’s expectations have given women all kinds of weird hang ups up about sex and hooking up. Their minds are full of strange rationalizations and justifications. 
Women are powerless to resist the right type of guy. Even if they’re married, they’ll get sucked along. 
Women are easily manipulated by simple magic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The below list just about describes my ex-wife and new wife to a tee. What they feel is more important than facts&#8230;</p>
<p>Women are flaky and unreliable.<br />
Women are emotional and illogical.<br />
Women only live in the emotion of the moment, do what feels good at the time, and justify their actions to themselves after the fact.<br />
Women are manipulative and use guys for free drinks and dinners.<br />
Women are fickle and have short attention spans.<br />
Women are self-centered and self-interested.<br />
Women primarily go to clubs for attention and validation from men.<br />
Women constantly test men, try to devalue them, and try to make them jump through hoops.<br />
Women try to make men suck up to them and put them on a pedestal.<br />
Women think their pussies are made of gold and sell them to the highest bidder.<br />
Women don’t know what they really want.<br />
Women are confused and hypocritical. They’ll profess to dislike whorish behavior then blow a guy in a bathroom that night.<br />
Women are programmed to want to get knocked up by an Alpha Male then ensnare an unwitting Beta Male into raising the child for her.<br />
Women will cheat on their partners coldly and unemotionally.<br />
Women are slaves to how their friends and society sees them. They want to sleep around, but have to be discrete about it.<br />
Society’s expectations have given women all kinds of weird hang ups up about sex and hooking up. Their minds are full of strange rationalizations and justifications.<br />
Women are powerless to resist the right type of guy. Even if they’re married, they’ll get sucked along.<br />
Women are easily manipulated by simple magic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
