Anatomy of Female Power Download and Discussion Page


This is a page where you can download a PDF of the long out of print book on sexual politics The Anatomy of Female Power. I think it’s one of the most enlightening and controversial treatises on sexual warfare I’ve ever read and changed my views on just about everything. And unlike most books that bash feminism, it also bashes men. And not just the liberal beta male (who he calls “mushos”) but the conservative traditional macho male as well (who he calls “machos”), with convincing arguments. No one is safe in it.

Note, there are two pages missing from the book, pages 95 and 96. This is not a mistake made when scanning the book, my copy actually looks like that. Same goes for the occasional paragraphs where the text is so light you can barely see the words.

To get a hint of what the book is about, from the Back Matter:

Highlights from the book

  • Feminism is a revolt in paradise
  • Men may rule the world, but women rule the men who rule the world.
  • When his penis stands up, a man’s brain takes French leave
  • The brunt of the double standard is borne, not by women, but by men
  • A macho is a strutting factotum with bulging biceps, stone-dry eyes, brains that are ruled by his gonads, and an ego indoctrinated to believe that he is the lord and master of the woman who rules him.
  • The modern musho (the new or feminal man) is one of that breed of diffident men who have been bullied, guilt-tripped, ego-bashed and penis-twisted into pram pushing, diaper changing and breast envy.

Normally I wouldn’t put up a whole book online like this out of copyright respect, but this book has been long out of print and is not even available in the US anymore. If anyone out there with legal claim to this copyright has issues with this, feel free to email me.

Download instructions: You can either right-click the link below and choose “Save Link As…” if using Firefox or “Save Target As…” if using Internet Explorer and download it as a PDF. Or you can left-click it to open it up inside your browser window and then click “File” and then “Save As…” on your browser menu.

Click Here to Download Anatomy of Female Power PDF

Also, feel free to scroll down to the comments section and discuss your thoughts on the book before, while or after you read it.

53 Responses to “Anatomy of Female Power Download and Discussion Page”


  1. Thanks for making this available. I’d heard about this book somewhere a while ago and was curious about reading it, but couldn’t find it anywhere even for sale, let alone in any library near me.

    Really enjoying the Madonna/Whore series, btw.


  2. Thanks a lot as well, looks very interesting.

    Btw, this is one of the most insightful blogs I have come across. And this comes from someone who reads a lot of them.

    Fine work all around!


  3. I would disagree that women control the kitchen. Maybe it was true when the book was written but today,women are becoming less and less likely to be stay-at-home-moms and hence a lot refuse to cook.

    There is also a HUGE difference between women power and men power. The power women have over men is given to the women by the mens WEAKNESS and lack of forthsight. Although it’s true the legal system favors women, men have a choice not to be in the situation.

    Consider a man who has a good career, makes good money, refuses to get married and has no children(vasectomy). What power can a women have over such man? The only power she can possibly have is power that he willingly gives her.

    The status quo of a men is to have more power than a women, while women have to, in a way, convenience men to give power. And who in our society pitty men who are weak.


  4. Skeptic, you’re right about the cooking thing. That is one of the ironies of feminism. It teaches women to try to chase a male ideal of power, money and status, and forsake their traditional power base, which is the cradle and the kitchen.

    The status quo of a men is to have more power than a women, while women have to, in a way, convenience men to give power. And who in our society pitty men who are weak.

    No, the problem here is that you are subscribing to a male definition of power. Men had the power to wage wars and make money, but women had the power to reap all the benefits of war and money without having to take any of the risks or doing the heavy lifting. Such is the male ego to believe their form of power is the most important form of power and status, the only one that matters. But the person that can get you to give everything away without even firing a shot or raising a fist, the person who dominates you without you even knowing it and lets you keep thinking you’re in charge so that you never get disgruntled and try to change the status quo, THAT is real power. Men don’t just “give” power to women, women actively and traditionally take it through superior mental moves. When it comes to sexual games, men are still playing checkers while women have always been playing chess.

    Consider a man who has a good career, makes good money, refuses to get married and has no children(vasectomy). What power can a women have over such man? The only power she can possibly have is power that he willingly gives her.

    Yes, this is fine in theory, but what man do you know who would willingly do this? Most men’s egos are too strong to pass up the opportunity to pass their genes along. Most men are too traditional to not want to raise their children with a woman. And most men are simply too enthrall to the spell pussy puts them under to say no when it gets used as a bargaining chip. Men are slaves to their sex drives, and smart women know how to exploit that. Men can come up with all the left-brain theories on earth to figure out how to seduce women, but since the beginning of time women have known all they have to do is get a man’s dick hard and then ask him for anything they want.

    Men don’t just give women things out of their good nature and big hearts, willing to take it away at any time. men give women things because they are biologically, psychologically and culturally driven and compelled to do so. They are addicted to pussy and female approval. It’s like saying a drug addict has power over the drug dealer because he gives the dealer money out of his good nature and if he stops giving it at any time the dealer is powerless. This works in theory, but good luck stopping the addict from wanting to give the drug dealer money. Pussy and feminine approval are man’s worst addictions by far.

    Read the first few chapters of the book if you haven’t already. I think Chinweizu makes a much better case than I ever could.


  5. “Consider a man who has a good career, makes good money, refuses to get married and has no children(vasectomy). What power can a women have over such man? The only power she can possibly have is power that he willingly gives her.”

    Paying taxes is, unfortunately, not a choice. Everywhere, men still pay most of the taxes and those moneys eventually end up subsidizing women because all feminist countries are, by necessity, socialist (since the free market would legitimately discriminate against hiring women at the same rate as men in most occupations). To add insult to injury, women spend 80% of the consumer dollar.

    The fact that women keep on voting for more socialism in spite of the fact that collectivism makes individual men redundant to indivual women shows that most women care more about the wallet than the man. It’s the only way they can maintain their facade of independence.


  6. Men had the power to wage wars and make money, but women had the power to reap all the benefits of war and money without having to take any of the risks or doing the heavy lifting

    Agreed, but where did women get this power to reap all the benefits? You will say, “men are biologically addicted to pussy”,yes but let’s be more clear. Men are biologically addicted to pussy in general, but not to a specific pussy.

    blah I feel like I’m losing track of the argument at hand. I think the main question is, who has more power, men or women? The book is tryign to say that women have more power(so far I’ve read half the book, thx for the book). I disagree that women in general have more power, but the book does a good job on killing the myth that women are powerless.

    In general it must be that men and women have equal power.

    The best way to come to this conclusion is to consider the most powerful men and the most powerful women. Power in the sense of attracting the opposite sex.

    Consider a powerful man, male model + owner of a popular club. Basically I’m trying to say he has what women desire.

    Consider a powerful women, nurturing young female model.

    Who will have more power if they were to meet?
    To me it seems obvious that it can go either way, like a ball balanced on a pin. AND! it’s up to the MAN to choose if the MAN has more power AND! It’s up to the WOMAN to choose if the WOMAN has more power.

    The man can become entranced by this gorgeous girl’s pussy and be pushed and bent to her whim. Or he can realize that there is other pussy out there and if this girl is a bitch, then he can easily replace her. But again the man chooses to stay or leave.

    A similar argument can be drawn for the girls side.

    But the person that can get you to give everything away without even firing a shot or raising a fist, the person who dominates you without you even knowing it and lets you keep thinking you’re in charge so that you never get disgruntled and try to change the status quo, THAT is real power

    How about a man who fucks a different girl every night without commitment. A man with a high status job, that gives him economic freedom and respect in all the worlds societies. A man who can impregnate 50 different girls in 1 week just because. A man can be born hideous! and can still fuck desireable girls. Can girls be born hideous and fuck gorgeous guys?

    The game starts when the ball is dropped, and the ball is dropped in the center, who wins and who loses is up to the individuals playing. Our biggest limitation is our personal belief is what we can accomplish for ourselves.


  7. It’s like saying a drug addict has power over the drug dealer because he gives the dealer money out of his good nature and if he stops giving it at any time the dealer is powerless.

    If the drug dealer starts charging the drug addcit too much, the drug addict has the power to get his drugs from somewhere else. Better drugs at a discount!


  8. Just a thought before I have even read the book… Its interesting to see what extent some Middle Eastern societies have gone to in order to take away almost all power from women.

    Looking forward to reading it!


  9. thanks for making what will prove to be an important learning tool available

    the author is absolutely correct in stating that ALL human organizations/civilizations have been, and still are, fully matriarchal (though fronted by various male individuals and organizations)

    a close study of anthropology, archaeology, comparative mythology, religion, and modern civilizations reveals clearly that the collective feminine (matriarchy) has always been running the show

    unfortunately, few wish to expend the time and effort to make close studies (instead they have Opinions lol)

    much of our problem in uncovering/speaking the truth over the past half-century is beginning from a false premise — that men rule the world and that patriarchy is the standard and ongoing model of mass human organization (from which females must be “liberated”)

    i’ll help spread this page around

    thanks again

    ray


  10. Hi there!

    Thanks for making this available.

    What a great book! I’ve written from reflections on it in my own blog — feel free to peruse.

    On the conversation here –

    In general it must be that men and women have equal power.

    The best way to come to this conclusion is to consider the most powerful men and the most powerful women. Power in the sense of attracting the opposite sex.

    Consider a powerful man, male model + owner of a popular club. Basically I’m trying to say he has what women desire.

    Consider a powerful women, nurturing young female model

    That’s not a true comparison, though. Why?

    Females are hypergamous, and males are not. That is to say, left to their own devices, 80% of the women are sexually attracted to about 20% of the men — I am talking sexual attraction here, not husband selection. You are correct that as between the most in demand men and most women (not the 10s, but most women), there is something approaching a more equal sexual power. If the woman is a 10, however, you can throw that out — she has pure sexual power over *all* men, even male 10s. And when you move the top 20% of men into marriage to an 8, 9 or 10, again the woman reverts to having huge sexual power in the marriage over the husband. This was moreso when monogamy was stricter, but it even is today, assuming a man actually wants to have sex with his wife. But with respect to all the rest of the men, there is not an equal sexual power — not even close.

    Most women cannot marry the top 20% in any system other than polygamy. In a monogamous system, women have tremendous power sexually over the kinds of men they are selecting for marriage, generally speaking. As Chinuweizu says, they are selecting a nest slave. This is still the case today, even among high income women. Women are selecting men on the basis of hypergamy (best earning, highest status man who will have them), but generally speaking men are attracted to beauty, so the woman almost always has sexual power over the man. And again, once married, that power is made concrete –> her withholding of approval and sex are her twin tools to manipulate her husband into doing what she wants — one psychological and the other sexual. One replicating maternal approval and the other the forbidden maternal eros. Women own men once they marry them, and the legal changes to family law only strengthened this death grip women have over their husbands.

    I agree that men, to be free, need to wean themselves of their twin addictions to female approval and the power of the pussy. That doesn’t mean celibacy and avoiding women (unless you want that). But it does mean not allowing a woman to manipulate you, especially into marrying her, through her approval and sexual access. Men need to be stronger about that. Much stronger.

    It’s a great book, I think.


  11. the author is absolutely correct in stating that ALL human organizationscivilizations have been, and still are, fully matriarchal (though fronted by various male individuals and organizations)

    Consider King Henry the 8th, what women was in charge in the background? He had six wives two which he ordered to be killed, and who knows how many mistresses, all which no doubt were beautiful for his time.

    Also think about women in middle estern societies which are like property, they have no choice of who they will marry. These women are BOUGHT. You think these women ever refuse sex? Ever refuse to cook or clean? Ever hear of the rule you can’t beat your wife with a stick thicker than your thumb?

    Read what Aristotle said about women, in his eyes they were like children. Aristotle would have never taken ANY women seriously.

    In Sparta men were seperated from their family at age 7, at which time they began trainning for war. There was only small influences from mothers.

    So I think this book really reflects this century.

    In the old days if your wife were to talk over you, it would be SHOCKING! Today it’s common for a man to be scared to talk over his girlfriend.

    In the short term, women have huge power-it’s so amazing to fuck a beautiful girl for the first time, your almost willing to do anything. But it’s amazingness quickly fades. Thinking about it, it’s not hard to imagine a set of rules and action that would always keep you one step ahead.


  12. If the drug dealer starts charging the drug addcit too much, the drug addict has the power to get his drugs from somewhere else. Better drugs at a discount!

    Drug dealing does NOT work that way. At all. What you are discussing is an economics 101 situation with a rational consumer in an above-board free market with an elastic demand. Drugs are often cartels, meaning they fix prices, and dealers have set territories. It’s not like a second dealer can just set up shop down the corner from a first dealer and just undercut him. They’re very territorial. The distance a drug fiend would have to go to bargain shop, if he could even find another unaffiliated dealer to sell it to him at a lower price, would be pretty far. I don’t think I’ve ever met any drug fiend patient enough to bargain hunt and comparison shop when fiending. The reason your theory doesn’t work is because drugs have what is called an INELASTIC DEMAND. This link describes the problem more in depth. From the link:

    According to the authors, the fundamental problem plaguing the current war on drugs is that the demand for drugs is “inelastic.” “Elasticity of demand” is a term economists use to describe how sensitive consumers are to price. If consumers are more price-sensitive, this indicates that demand is elastic; if consumers are less price sensitive that suggests demand is inelastic. The authors argue that resources devoted to supplying drugs will rise with the imposition of the drug war if demand is inelastic, and fall if demand is elastic. If the demand for drugs were highly elastic, efforts to reduce consumption would be relatively effective—a more vigorous drug war would lead to higher prices and a larger percentage reduction in consumption.

    The relatively ineffective nature of the U.S. drug war and the growth of the international drug industry suggest that inelastic demand may well fit the U.S. experience.

    Inelastic demand creates a difficult situation for stamping out drugs because the more the government tries to reduce consumption, the more steeply consumers’ willingness to pay rises. As a result, the total amount consumers on the whole are willing to spend increases. This pattern creates greater incentives for suppliers to find ways to bring drugs to the market. With inelastic demand, the total amount people spend on drugs will rise, the harder the government fights the war.

    When the average dude with no game get a chance to get pussy from an attractive women who is not a prostitute, and she offers just enough challenge and resistance to raise her value in his eyes, he’s pretty much like the drug addict. The average guy has a scarcity mentality when it comes to quality women.


  13. Skeptic, here is the problem with your examples of male power…they’re outliers. You are using the exceptions as if they were the norm. That would be like me using Queen Elizabeth I, Cleopatra, and Oprah Winfrey to demonstrate the average woman’s traditional power level in male-dominated fields.

    How about a man who fucks a different girl every night without commitment.

    Outlier. What percentage of men have the game and status to pull this off? In the Western world, I’d say it’s less than 10%. Maybe if the seduction community really hits the mainstream and the average guy starts getting decent skills we’ll see enough of this type of guy that he is no longer an outlier, but for now he’s an extreme exception. Guys with this level of skill pale in number to women who can and have gotten guys twisted around their finger with the promise of their vaginas. I believe in any closed community, on average maybe 10% of the guys score most of the women. The vast majority of men are slaves to pussy power and praise their good fortune any time they can luck into sex. You can’t use these lotharios as indicators of the average man. There wouldn’t be so much money in selling seduction advice to men if this skill level was common.

    A man with a high status job, that gives him economic freedom and respect in all the worlds societies.

    Do you know how many men with high status jobs don’t get any ass? Who are slaves to a wife who pushes them around. And are reduced to frequenting prostitutes? (Eliot Spitzer) High status with no game pretty much pales in comparison to, say, a low status bartender or dive bar band member with tons of game. In fact, many of the men with high status jobs tend to have the least game because they were studying during the ages when the bad boys were learning social skills and seduction techniques.

    Watch a documentary or clip about seduction workshop and you’ll find most of the customers actually have high status jobs and can’t get laid. The customers would actually have to have high status jobs, because who else could afford those prices? The prices are often in the THOUSANDS for just one weekend. You can see a list of prices here:
    http://www.seductionreview.net.....=Bootcamps

    Look how much men are willing to pay and the lengths they are willing to go to get women? If someone offered women a course on how to get men, how much money do you think they could get away with charging? Could they get away with the $2000 to $3000 prices the courses for men get? No. Why? Because women are the choosers. In most societies these days the women, or the women’s family in more traditional societies, are the choosers. And the chooser has the power. The chooser is always the one with more power. for example the employer is the chooser of the applicant, and few would argue he had less power than the applicant.

    A man can be born hideous! and can still fuck desireable girls. Can girls be born hideous and fuck gorgeous guys?

    YES. WITHOUT QUESTION A HIDEOUS GIRL CAN. I could send out a hideous guy into a bar and a hideous girl into a bar and 99 times out of a 100 I can bet you the hideous girl would get a better looking sex partner than the hideous guy. EASILY. Just about every good looking guy I know has a fattie or ugly chick skeleton in is closet.

    Consider King Henry the 8th, what women was in charge in the background? He had six wives two which he ordered to be killed, and who knows how many mistresses, all which no doubt were beautiful for his time.

    Henry VIII is another, even more extreme outlier. What percentage of men in the history of existence have held his level of power? You can’t use him as an example of the average man’s power. But let’s examine him anyway. He may have very well been the most powerful British king ever. And yet he had a weakness for women. So much so that for all his power and wealth and stature, even he was laid low for a while by a woman WAY beneath his station in power, lineage and wealth, Anne Boleyn. And she is widely regarded by historians as no great beauty, but actually of somewhat average looks. And what was the simple weapon this woman of lesser status needed to utterly control the king’s mind, drive him to divorce his wife, fight the whole Vatican and get excommunicated, to change the whole religion of England, set up a new church just to get a divorce and almost drive Europe to war as a result? SHE SIMPLY WITHHELD ACCESS TO HER PUSSY UNTIL HE MARRIED HER. What other powerful (by male standards) kings with huge armies and armaments would never have been able to push Henry to do in a million years by force and intimidation powerless Anne Boleyn (by men’s standards) accomplished by just closing her legs. By just withholding access to her pussy, the whole course of a nation’s destiny changed. She only fell out of his good graces by the bad luck of not being able to bear him a son, otherwise she could have lasted much longer and maybe never fell. By controlling the most powerful man (by male standards) in England, she for a while controlled the fate of all England. Now what is more common and easier achieved in human histry, men with the type of power Henry VIII yielded, that of kings with huge amounts of land, and armies and navies, or women with the power o Anne Boleyn, the power to withhold a vagina from a man who wants it. I’ve never met a man in my lifetime yet with Henry VIII’s level of power. I rarely meet men with enough game to pull a different girl every night. I meet a woman every day who has made a man beg for access to her pussy and had her deny it to him.

    Read what Aristotle said about women, in his eyes they were like children. Aristotle would have never taken ANY women seriously.

    In Sparta men were seperated from their family at age 7, at which time they began trainning for war. There was only small influences from mothers.

    So I think this book really reflects this century.

    I think in human history the views of the Ancient Greeks were not all that common, but even if you’re right and the book really reflects this century, that still means the book is accurate. The book never claims to describe human relations since the very beginning of time. It’s a book about now. Pointing out that it really reflects this century disproves nothing. We live in this century, not in Spartan times.


  14. Another thing to consider, even in traditional polygamous Muslim societies, in a surprising way, pussy power still has much influence, even though they are thought of as the ultimate male dominated societies. Unlike in a monogamous society where each man no matter how powerful can only have one women, in such polygamous societies a small percentage of men, the most powerful ones, can hoard most of the women. For these men, one can say they may arguably have most power. But for the men left without women, who are a majority, pussy still rules them in a way you wouldn’t expect. Consider this article from psychology today:

    # Most suicide bombers are Muslim

    According to the Oxford University sociologist Diego Gambetta, editor of Making Sense of Suicide Missions, a comprehensive history of this troubling yet topical phenomenon, while suicide missions are not always religiously motivated, when religion is involved, it is always Muslim. Why is this? Why is Islam the only religion that motivates its followers to commit suicide missions?

    The surprising answer from the evolutionary psychological perspective is that Muslim suicide bombing may have nothing to do with Islam or the Koran (except for two lines in it). It may have nothing to do with the religion, politics, the culture, the race, the ethnicity, the language, or the region. As with everything else from this perspective, it may have a lot to do with sex, or, in this case, the absence of sex.

    What distinguishes Islam from other major religions is that it tolerates polygyny. By allowing some men to monopolize all women and altogether excluding many men from reproductive opportunities, polygyny creates shortages of available women. If 50 percent of men have two wives each, then the other 50 percent don’t get any wives at all.

    So polygyny increases competitive pressure on men, especially young men of low status. It therefore increases the likelihood that young men resort to violent means to gain access to mates. By doing so, they have little to lose and much to gain compared with men who already have wives. Across all societies, polygyny makes men violent, increasing crimes such as murder and rape, even after controlling for such obvious factors as economic development, economic inequality, population density, the level of democracy, and political factors in the region.

    However, polygyny itself is not a sufficient cause of suicide bombing. Societies in sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean are much more polygynous than the Muslim nations in the Middle East and North Africa. And they do have very high levels of violence. Sub-Saharan Africa suffers from a long history of continuous civil wars—but not suicide bombings.

    The other key ingredient is the promise of 72 virgins waiting in heaven for any martyr in Islam. The prospect of exclusive access to virgins may not be so appealing to anyone who has even one mate on earth, which strict monogamy virtually guarantees. However, the prospect is quite appealing to anyone who faces the bleak reality on earth of being a complete reproductive loser.

    It is the combination of polygyny and the promise of a large harem of virgins in heaven that motivates many young Muslim men to commit suicide bombings. Consistent with this explanation, all studies of suicide bombers indicate that they are significantly younger than not only the Muslim population in general but other (nonsuicidal) members of their own extreme political organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah. And nearly all suicide bombers are single.

    Think about that. Pussy is such a powerful motivator to men that lack of access to it combined with the promise of imaginary pussy in the sky can drive men to fly planes into buildings. How can the person who owns such a weapon, the vagina, and uses it wisely rather than squandering it and spreading it around town like a Sex and the City character, not have a ton of power? Men are blowing themselves up just for the hopes of getting some in the afterlife.


  15. yes, like two other inelastic drugs: cigarettes and alcohol


  16. If the bulk of female game consists of looking attractive, then many women do spend thousands of dollars on developing their “game”: plastic surgery, cosmetics, fashion.

  17. The Man in Brown. on May 29th, 2009 at 12:57 PM

    Since the page that introduces the chapter about mans fear of woman is missing, I hypothesize that the fear comes from the already present need for approval from woman. A person would only need the approval of another if they thought that the other person was above them in some way, so it follows that fear and adoration would come from the underling. Fear being the most useful.


  18. I read this book and it was very interesting. I have become interested in South America after making some colombian friends, so I was reading through a book about understanding south americans on google books: http://books.google.com/books?.....s#PPA79,M1

    I could not believe me eyes when I read through chapter 6 which starts on page 79. Especially read page 83. It talks about how the women let the men feel like they have power but really control everything. They make fun of the men when they are by themselves because the men think they are in charge.


  19. If men and women have such equal power, you fail to explain the male pimp/ female Ho dynamic. How is it that a male can have a group of decent looking women out there willing to sell sex for him, then return ALL the proceeds of the sales to HIM? Theres something else at work here…

    The power that a man has over a woman, and always will have, is wisdom. The knowledge of knowing how to interact with a female; not based on physical sexuality, but based on pure psychology. When you understand what makes a woman tick internally, and what drives her sexuality, you will know real power with the female gender.

    In order for a man to have and to excersize true masculine power, he has to first have mental control over his own sex drive. Frankly, he has to have dick control. A man without dick control, I don’t care how powerful or wealthy he is…he can and will eventually fall under the control of a female.

    Theres a reason why God required ALL males in ancient Israel to submit to the act of circumcision. And it wasn’t just for healthy hygiene. Its really all about men having the will power to take charge of their masculinity. By submitting their manhood to God…one’s inner spiritual force…they effectively check-mate women from ever being able to control him.

    Think about all the powerful men over the past half a century; men from all srata of society…who fell because of being a slave to their own sex drive:

    Bill Clinton (politics)
    Eliot Spencer (politics)
    Jimmy Swaggart (religion)
    Jim Bakker (religion)
    Michael Straham (sports entertainment)
    John Edwards (politics)
    Strom Thurmond (politics)
    Bob Johnson (business)

    One things for certain: If you don’t control your own masculine sex drive, some woman will eventually control it for you. And woe unto you when she does…


  20. If men and women have such equal power, you fail to explain the male pimp/ female Ho dynamic. How is it that a male can have a group of decent looking women out there willing to sell sex for him, then return ALL the proceeds of the sales to HIM? Theres something else at work here…

    Great comment overall.

    First, I don’t claim that men and women have equal power. I think men have more hard power and women have more soft power. However, at the end of the day I think women’s soft power outweighs men’s soft power, primarily because men underestimate it so. Hard power announces itself, you see it coming. You can prepare for it, fight it, run away from it to avoid it altogether. Soft power you often don’t see coming until its too late. It’s seductive, like as drug. You’re happy for the privilege of surrendering to it. Like a drug, you believe you are in charge the whole time until it’s realize too late that it rules you. Female approval whether of the maternal or sexual nature rules man.

    As for the rest of your comment, it’s dead on. I’ve discussed the pimp dynamic previously, and you nailed the reason it works. Allow me to elaborate on your point.

    Pimps are the exception not the rule. How many people do we know that have anything approaching a pimp dynamic with their woman? Now compare that to the number of men who are henpecked by their wives and always trying to please them, protect them and make enough money to satisfy and impress them. Better yet, think of it like this: what are there more of, pimps, people who have gained mastery over the pussy power, or johns, people who are mastered BY the pussy power. Obviously there have to be a lot more johns than pimps otherwise pimping wouldn’t be so lucrative and the whole business model would fall apart. The mere fact that pimping is so lucrative is just more proof of the power of pussy over men, because it shows the extent men will go to pay for it. The fact that pimps are so fascinating to mainstream America shows how out of the ordinary their power level is, as opposed to the dynamic of say Raymond’s character on Everybody Loves Raymond.

    The precise reason pimps defy the power dynamic described by Chinweizu isn’t because the female power dynamic is false, but rather because the female power dynamic is true and pimps are among the few men who understand it enough to defy it and reverse it. As I’ve posted in my pimp-related posts, pimps reverse the typical female-male sexual dynamic back on the woman by withholding sex and approval from the woman and doling it out as a reward for good behavior and compliance. Something most men don’t have the self-discipline to do. Pimps withhold sex from prostitutes more than they actually have sex with them.

    Pimps also tend to not have their mothers on a pedestal according to Iceberg Slim’s theories. If this is true for most pimps, that means that they have effectively nullified the two most common avenues of female soft power: the motherhood dynamic and the sexual rewarding dynamic.


  21. So true! So true indeed…

    I want to also add: Men have soft power too. We just don’t use it! Trumping the pussy card…making vagina irrelevant to one’s self…this is THE key to mastery with women. It throws women for a complete loop. From personal experience, I’ve gotten more sex from the baddest females by playing uninterested in them than I have by displaying obvious interest. Females by nature want what they can’t have. Its the whole ‘Eve’ theory. Tell her she can’t have it, and she wants it more than anything else. But give it to her, and she’ll throw it on the trash heap.

    Men need to read more blogs like this one to re-discover their own power. They need to realize that money isn’t power when it comes to women; confidence and self-control gives one power over women. The one thing she knows she has that men all want is her cunt. So when a guy comes along who isn’t impressed by her having a pussy, this throws her entire mental into an uproar! Here’s a guy who finally is her match. Heres someone she cannot control. He even has the potential to control her.

    Its ironic: the same chicks who stop having sex with their husbands or boyfriends, no matter how much their man begs them for it, will do the nastiest, freakiest sexual things to some new dude who wasn’t even trying to hit it. Obviously theres a principle at work here…

    I like your posts on this subject. We need more stuff out here along these lines to help these younger bucks coming after us. Keep up the good writing.


  22. Has anyone ever considered that maybe men in the west have such a false definition of what a man is that the pressure drives him to medicate himself with sex?
    Also the west bombards men with the idea that it is something wrong with being male.

    Men have been forced to adopt a feminine perspective of domesticity.

    Despite the fact that 2/3 of all reported child abuse cases are committed by women, men bear the blame for being insensitive to children.

    Men have to play the game like they are the ogres and mask their feelings ,and live up to the magnificent standard of being a provider.

    Are boys supposed to be nice and quiet all the time even, when they are bullied?

    Are men allowed to get angry? Are men allowed to cry?
    Are men told they don’t load the dishwashers right?

    What would a man be called if he criticized his wife for how she mowed the lawn or organized the tool bench?

    Where does it say that the husbands alone are responsible for the well being of the home?

    Where does it say that a husband is not to expect nothing in return for sacrificing himself for his wife and kids?

    Where did that thinking come from.


  23. Wow, I have all that power? This fear men are experiencing is directly related to missing mommy in the kitchen. They want to go back to the days where the woman stayed home and baked cookies, wore dresses while vacuuming, sorry to burst your bubble, you can’t put the Genie back in the bottle. Stop crying and missing mommies skirt. Grow up infantile boys.


  24. Don’t flatter yourself sweetie…thats just it; you DON’T have all the power! The power you seem to have is based on trickery and cunning…not actual real power. Your power as a female is dependent strictly on men’s lack of wisdom. The worst thing men ever did was to start dis-believing the bible. If he would at once begin to delve into its mysteries, with a heart open to understanding, men would regain their sense of control and power in this world!

    God gave men the power from the jump; but men have willingly given it away by acting more like females, and less like the sons of God that they really are.

    But I will say this: life is often much like a chess game. If you, as a female. know how to ‘use what you got to get what you want’, I’m not mad at you…do YOU! If you can meet you a wonderful provider who doesn’t know his masculine power, and who will allow you to make him a pussy slave…go for it! His socially retarded ass should take the time to reconnect with his own spirituality, regain his sense of mastery, and take charge of his life. And if you can enslave him before he can set himself free, crack that whip like a true slave driver…

    Just know that one day, he may wake up. And then…the tricks will be over, his eyes will be open, and you’ll be left with NO legs to stand on.


  25. for fun cross reference this book in discussion with /www.womensinfidelity.com, the little i could read on the web site mentioned and some of the book i read on amazon i come to the conclusion that she(the author) does not understand what motivates her and other women’s sexual drive and reasons of their own actions


  26. or fun cross reference this book in discussion with /www.womensinfidelity.com, the little i could read on the web site mentioned and some of the book i read on amazon i come to the conclusion that she(the author) does not understand what motivates her and other women’s sexual drive and reasons of their own actions

    I disagree totally. I’ve read that book, and not only is it mindblowing and right on the money based on my personal experiences, I don’t think it actually contradicts much of what’s in Chinweizu’s book. It just approaches it from a different perspective. I would totally recommend Women’s Infidelity.


  27. I disagree too. She hit the nail directly on the head! Its good to hear the realness coming from a female for a change. I totally second that recommendation…

    95% of divorces would probably never happen if more men realized how important it is for the male to be a challenge throughout the relationship. As a man, you have to create your own world to live in. Never should you leave your world in order to join up with a woman’s world! She’s supposed to leave her world behind to become a part of yours! Thats a mistake many men make. Before he meets the female, he has friends…a life…his own places he likes to hang out at…the things he loves to do; hell, even has his own place. Then, when he’s been smitten by some chick, the same guy stops hanging out with the fellas, because ‘she’ doesn’t like his friends…he moves from a bachelor set up to having in house pussy…he stops living his own unique life, and centers his life around that one female. Essentially making her his entire world! And that, my friend, is pure vagina worship.

    Once a woman sees that she is no longer on a journey with you, but instead you’ve decided to make HER the journey…she’s gonna lose interest in you. Fast! You’ve ceased to be a challenge…check mate! Game over, you lose.

    Men, be a challenge. Never become so predictable and common that your woman starts taking you for granted. If necessary, start making your presence scarce. Go out with your own friends. Date other women. You don’t have to worry about losing her. She’ll be too busy enjoying the chase of trying to get you back under her control. Women LOVE a man that plays hard to get. So flip the script…reverse the tables on her. She’ll love you for it!


  28. thanks for the comments, i did not read the book, i only read what little i saw and drew the wrong conclusion, thanks again!


  29. tell me more about women’s infidelity


  30. Just wanted to add, there are some pro-feminist arguments in Women’s Infidelity, but to Langley’s credit she’s one of the few women I’ve read make pro-feminism arguments that are pragmatic and plausible, even if at the end of the day you don’t agree with them. Too many pro-feminist arguments mindlessly boil down to “men can do it, so we want it too!” Langley on the other hand gives practical historical reasons that explain why women, rightly or wrongly, would feel motivated to hang onto feminism, even if its not totally making them happy at the end of the day.


  31. T,
    That’s the most interesting commentary on pimps I’ve ever read. You also seem to imply that if men in relationships developed the self-discipline to do that they could recreate that pimp/ho dynamic, in essence the coy female/ardent male dynamic. Women are changeable and their desire is dependent on many variables, so if a woman refuses her boyfriend he can spend lots of time mulling over why she did. The male libido being what it is there’s really no logical explanation for a man in a relationship to chronically withhold sex unless he wants to break up. Now that would initially throw a woman for a loop but would she become nervous, agitated and clamor for sex and approval from him? That might work if she were very insecure or not too bright, as I’m sure most prostitutes are. But, especially if he showed no signs of clinical depression or something like, a confident woman with anything on the ball would figure out she was being manipulated.


  32. Interesting comment…
    If only life was as simple as you portray it! How many women on the ball are in relationships where there’s gross manipulation involved…and yet these women stay in it?

    And the average prostitute is far brighter than the average ‘square’ female…hands down! She’s outsmarting dozens of men on a daily basis; married men, men in monogamous relationships, men of worldly importance, religious men…dudes of every type and caliber in our society. And how many insecure women do you know of who have the confidence to get buck naked in front of hundreds of men? The average woman is so insecure about herself, it takes her 2 hours just to put on something basic to wear to the grocery store.

    Another thing: women are notorious approval seekers. Its one of your easiest points of manipulation. A man of wisdom knows you subconsciously need masculine approval; so all he has to do is position himself so that you’ll seek HIS approval. Then he can manipulate you at will…
    And even when a woman knows she’s being used or manipulated, if she’s feeling that man, and invested lots of time and emotion in him, she still will hang in there. This has nothing to do with esteem; it has everything to do with biology and psychology.

    Now onto the ‘logic’ of withholding sex: It takes the sexual power away from the female and gives it back to the man…it sends a message to her that he’s nothing like the average guy; this man is different, distinct, unique…it puts the man in control of himself…and it makes him an immediate challenge to the female thats used to getting what she wants easily from men. Dick control is the ultimate weapon a man has in his favor. Too bad most men don’t realize or use it…


  33. “How many women on the ball are in relationships where there’s gross manipulation involved…and yet these women stay in it?”

    Women who knowingly stay in such relationships think they are getting something out of it. Usually they are insecure and think they can’t do any better, but sometimes the guy has money, social status. If they stay it’s a conscious choice not because they become like men begging for sex.

    “And the average prostitute is far brighter than the average ’square’ female…hands down! She’s outsmarting dozens of men on a daily basis; married men, men in monogamous relationships, men of worldly importance, religious men…dudes of every type and caliber in our society.”

    I’m sure there are smart prostitutes, but most probably keep their money for themselves instead of handing it over to a pimp.

    “And how many insecure women do you know of who have the confidence to get buck naked in front of hundreds of men?”

    Insecure women who live in the present become addicted to the instant approval they get from men when they take off their clothes. Of course that approval isn’t based on respect and thus evaporates almost instantly but since they usually don’t think that far ahead that doesn’t affect their subsequent actions.

    How does an average prostitute outsmart her clients? A prostitute might get some money in the short term, but that job only lasts as long as her youth. The smart thing to do is get an education and find a high-quality mate.

    “And even when a woman knows she’s being used or manipulated, if she’s feeling that man, and invested lots of time and emotion in him, she still will hang in there. This has nothing to do with esteem; it has everything to do with biology and psychology.”

    Biology and psychology play a role, but for how long? Every woman has been in an unhappy relationship but while some stay in them briefly before moving to greener pastures some stay with men who mistreat them for decades. The difference is confidence. An insecure woman may feel disrespected but she thinks she’s lucky to have him(or any man at all). A confident woman knows that she’s better than that and will walk if she’s not treated right.

    “Now onto the ‘logic’ of withholding sex: It takes the sexual power away from the female and gives it back to the man…it sends a message to her that he’s nothing like the average guy; this man is different, distinct, unique…it puts the man in control of himself…and it makes him an immediate challenge to the female thats used to getting what she wants easily from men. Dick control is the ultimate weapon a man has in his favor. Too bad most men don’t realize or use it…”

    I understand the logic of it from the man’s point of view, and I understand how that could intrigue a woman if you’re not in a relationship, but once you are there’s no reason for a man to consistently refuse sex unless he’s running game. A smart, confident women will see that she’s being played.


  34. Your statements seem to continue the popular thread in our society, that women are constantly victimized by mean, scheming, no good men; men who are out to use and abuse them. And these thoughts go right to the heart of why feminism is such folly…If women are so ‘equal’ to men, why are they constantly found in the position of being victimized and manipulated? They should in turn be just as slick and on top of things as men are! But they’re not.

    And men have every right to withhold sex, especially in a relationship. Its what women have been doing for years now! But somethings wrong with the man if he does it…So what you’re really implying is that the women who are withholding sex are obviously running some type of game on the man. Hmmmm…thanks for that observation!Seems to me that men should in turn wise up and realize that females who withhold sex are playing them, point blank. I hope you men out there are reading this…

    I’m afraid when it comes to biology and pyschology, there’s nothing you can do about it. It won’t change; it hasn’t changed in thousands or millions of years; all depending on which theory of earth age you subscribe to.

    As for the ‘outsmarting’ prostitute: Prostitutes understand the male/female dynamic in its most primal form. She knows she needs a man for certain things; most of them having NOTHING to do with sex. She doesn’t hold any false beliefs in the superiority of women over men; instead, she understands the natural order of things: Man as the head, female created for his help and his pleasure. Its the same roles that all older generations of humans have lived by; and its only THIS present generation that wants to change the natural order of things for one that obviously doesn’t work.

    Relationships don’t work today because there are no clearly defined roles any more. Women want to be like men, men have cow towed into the roles of women. Women will NEVER be happy in their relationships unless they are submitted to a worthy man. Hate it if you want; argue against it if you may…but it won’t change reality.

    You women out there don’t want to be in control! You don’t even want true equality! If you did, you would push for the abolishment of ALL alimony laws; you would push for a more equitable form of child support/custody distribution…I could go on. You don’t even want equality in your relationships. If so, you would have NO problem getting up at 3 in the morning to check the strange noise you heard coming from the kitchen; instead of waking the man to go. When the house needs painting or the gutters need cleaning, you’d have NO issue pulling out that ladder and getting the job done; instead of nagging your husband or boyfriend to do it.

    Lets keep it real: women want special rights, not equal rights. But what you want more than that is a real man; someone who challenges you; who puts you in check when you need it; who can give you a clear vision and sense of direction…clear mutual goals to work towards; someone who can be strong for the both of you when you’re own strength has failed; you want a goddam MAN! Not some weak, clingy, wussified momma’s boy, who believes all men and women are equal.

    What if we ran the military the way women are asking for relationships to be run…on a 50/50 basis? Nothing would ever get done! Someone has to be the general; someone has to carry out the general’s orders. There’s no voting on it. There’s no democracy in that! You don’t go to your job and expect to be equal to your boss. You follow your bosses orders without a mumbling peep; yet, you refuse to respect the authority of the man in your life. So your relationships are out of order.

    And thats how they will remain until women stop acting Eve-ish, and act more like the virtuous woman spoken of in Proverbs…and the Men TAKE their authority as Men, take command of their relationships, and start firing those hard to deal with, rebellious women that exist in their lives. Fire them, and replace them with a more cooperative woman.


  35. “Your statements seem to continue the popular thread in our society, that women are constantly victimized by mean, scheming, no good men.”

    Isn’t withholding sex to maintain control of the relationship a scheme?

    You’re right that feminists unfairly absolve women of personal responsibility, and I don’t agree with that. Adult women who are legally free can leave these relationships whenever they want. If they don’t that’s there choice and they have to own up to it.

    “I’m afraid when it comes to biology and pyschology, there’s nothing you can do about it.”

    Are you saying that ALL women end up in pimp/ho situations, or in that dynamic among law abiding people. You’ve never met women who’ve left abusive relationships, or who have husbands and boyfriends who treat them respect?

    “She doesn’t hold any false beliefs in the superiority of women over men; instead, she understands the natural order of things: Man as the head, female created for his help and his pleasure.”

    It sounds like you’re articulating a religious belief. Feminists articulate, using fuzzy goddess metaphors, their belief the moral and spiritual superiority of women. You and feminists have a right to your religious beliefs but it doesn’t follow that a person making logical argument must concede to them.

    “Relationships don’t work today because there are no clearly defined roles any more. Women want to be like men, men have cow towed into the roles of women. Women will NEVER be happy in their relationships unless they are submitted to a worthy man.”

    True enough, but where are the smart confident women who consider a man behaving like a pimp to be worthy? Some women are damaged enough to accept any treatment but women who figure out the score will leave and find men who are secure in their masculine power and don’t feel the need to act like women.

    “And men have every right to withhold sex, especially in a relationship.

    Of course men have the right to withold sex. However that men on average have higher sex drives than men is established science. A woman with her (usually) lower sex drive can plausibly say that she just isn’t as sexual as her man. Women know that most men have higher sex drives than most women so even if they are initially intrigued by a man who’s not sexually available they’ll soon start to think he’s weird, gay etc. Smart confident women know that biology and psychology render that implausible over time in healthy straight men, so they’ll see that it’s smoke and mirrors.

    “Its what women have been doing for years now! But somethings wrong with the man if he does it”

    This argument sounds reminds me of feminists saying ‘Men do it all the time, but something’s wrong with a woman if she does it.’

    “You women out there don’t want to be in control! You don’t even want true equality! If you did, you would push for the abolishment of ALL alimony laws; you would push for a more equitable form of child support/custody distribution…I could go on.”

    You’re right about feminists. They want the autonomy and control of men but the protections of women, and no one can have it all. But how is what you’re describing any different? If you’ve studied a traditional culture where men controlled women by abstaining from sex and giving out sex and approval as a reward for good behavior I would love to hear about it. You want men to have the hard power of men in traditional societies plus sexual power of women. Which I can understand from your perspective but I don’t see how a man can have withhold sex to manipulate a woman and still be a traditionally masculine man.

    “Man as the head, female created for his help and his pleasure. Its the same roles that all older generations of humans have lived by”

    Older generations where? America? Traditionally men gained a sense of masculinity by protecting their families and providing for them. They had more legal control over their wives but they also had greater responsibility to them. Very few women could support families, and a breadwinner’s injury or illness frequently sent families to the poorhouse. Men who couldn’t or wouldn’t fulfill their masculine responsibilities to their families were not respected by their wives or other men. You may want more respect than most men get today but in America of previous generations no man was automatically assigned an adoring wife for being born with a Y chromosome. He earned his wife’s respect by working hard for their family. Alcoholics who couldn’t hold jobs weren’t respected, and no one was considered more cowardly or dishonorable than a man who deserted his wife and kids.

    “When the house needs painting or the gutters need cleaning, you’d have NO issue pulling out that ladder and getting the job done; instead of nagging your husband or boyfriend to do it.”

    Does your grandmother clean the gutters while your grandpa watches the game? You’re a clever guy but it’s not clear whether you’re criticizing feminists who don’t respect traditional masculine men or traditional feminine women who expect masculine responsibility from men.

    “Fire them, and replace them with a more cooperative woman.”

    Go ahead. No one should stay with partners who displease them.


  36. “Isn’t withholding sex to maintain control of the relationship a scheme?”

    In a normal world based on a normal society it would be; but in our present day society, its not only a necessary tool for men to use, but a mandatory one; if men are ever to reverse the vagina worship thats been programmed into us by the media and pop culture. For a man to withhold sex is to send a strong message to a woman that you cannot control him through the #1 method women have used to control men: SEX. You have to come with something better than just your tits and your ass…

    “Are you saying that ALL women end up in pimp/ho situations, or in that dynamic among law abiding people. You’ve never met women who’ve left abusive relationships, or who have husbands and boyfriends who treat them respect?”

    Not only do all women end up in the pimp/ho dynamic…but all Americans do period! Its called capitalism! Your boss, the owner…thats the pimp. You are the ho. You don’t control your life when you work for somebody else. Your life is controlled by your employer/pimp. He or she determines what hours of the day you have free to yourself, to spend with your own family. He or she determines how much house or car you can afford. In our society, someone has to be the pimp; and a whole lot more are going to do the hoing.

    And of course I’ve met women who left abusive relationships. But I’ve met way more who stayed in them. And when you say women with husbands or boyfriends who treat them with respect, I’m not sure exactly what you mean. Do you mean he caters to her moodswings and tantrums with total understanding of a woman’s emotional irregularities…and suffers them to be? Or do you mean he respects her in exact measurement to how she respects and honors him as her man? i need definition here…

    “It sounds like you’re articulating a religious belief. Feminists articulate, using fuzzy goddess metaphors, their belief the moral and spiritual superiority of women. You and feminists have a right to your religious beliefs but it doesn’t follow that a person making logical argument must concede to them.”

    I suppose that lions and bears, eagles and orangutans are religously oriented in your world view…? Because what I’m referring to is the natural order of things. This has nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with nature. Nothing fuzzy about it. Female lions know their place in the world, as do the male lions. If one intrudes over into the others defined role, they’re immediately brought back into place, and order is restored. The same applies to every other specie of animal. Is Mankind expected to be any different?
    The only moral ground I stand on is that for generations now, men have been pussified into a subservient role to women. And our society is totally out of sync because of it. Our prisons are more than bursting at the seams with evidence of a failed philosophy that puts women above men. Its not nature’s design. Funny thing about nature: you can violate her if you want, but she always gets her way in the end! Ask New Orleans if thats not the case…

    “True enough, but where are the smart confident women who consider a man behaving like a pimp to be worthy? Some women are damaged enough to accept any treatment but women who figure out the score will leave and find men who are secure in their masculine power and don’t feel the need to act like women.”

    You seem to imply that theres something wrong with the whole pimp/ho dynamic as a basic model for successful male/female relationships. You also seem to imply that ‘hoes’ are somehow lacking in smarts and confidence. Thats because you too have been conditioned by society to believe in the reversal of nature. You’ve bought the ‘koolade’, and you think its normal the way things are. Again, as an avid observer of documentaries about nature, i admonish you to consult with Mother nature herself.

    In your opinion, a self respecting woman would never give herself or her earnings to any man who expected that of her; or one who considered her place in the natural order of things to be one level a little lower than his own. But i hear little argument from you when women expect the very same things from men! A Man is expected to go out and bring his hard earned money home and lay it at his wife’s feet. Is this not pimping at its finest? Is he onto ‘the score’? Should he too be advised to leave his unworthy wife or girlfriend, who preys on his damaged esteem? Maybe he should leave this pimping relationship for a woman who is secure in her feminine power and doesn’t feel the need to act like a man…?

    “Of course men have the right to withold sex. However that men on average have higher sex drives than men(women?) is established science.”

    Not true. Just by design of nature, consider this: its a known scientific fact that a woman is capable of having multiple orgasms back to back; while a man can only have one at a time, then needs rest to replenish himself. Just by design of nature a woman HAS to have a higher sex drive. Thats another fallacy thats been programmed into our modern way of thinking. Women love sex just as much as we men do; most probably more so. If I could cum back to back without taking a break, I’d be a superfreak! Damn a job…I’d apply for welfare, order loads of internet porn, and whack off until I pulled a muscle! As long as men believe that only they want sex, and females would rather not, we’ll continue to produce weak kneed, spineless vagina worshippers; easily manipulated by conniving women who really know the truth, and keep the truth well hidden from men. MEN: SHE LOVES SEX JUST AS MUCH AS YOU DO!

    “A woman with her (usually) lower sex drive can plausibly say that she just isn’t as sexual as her man.”

    The real reason more women don’t like having sex in the relationship has more to do with men acting wussyish than anything else. Just like men are turned off by a masculine acting female, females are turned off by effeminate acting, vagina worshipping men. Again: women want and need MEN, not sissies!

    “Women know that most men have higher sex drives than most women so even if they are initially intrigued by a man who’s not sexually available they’ll soon start to think he’s weird, gay etc.”

    That would be true if he NEVER had sex with her. What I’m advocating is something more profound than sexual abstinance…I’m talking about flipping the whole sex game back onto women. I’m talking about the Man taking control of the sexual aspect of the relationship, instead of allowing himself to be led around like a dog with a collar around his neck. This takes discipline that the average man lacks. Thats why the average guy is a sex slave to his chick, who determines when, how, how often, and how long they can have sex.

    MEN; STEP UP AND TAKE YOUR POWER BACK. IT’S IN YOUR MIND AND IN YOUR DICK.

    “Smart confident women know that biology and psychology render that implausible over time in healthy straight men, so they’ll see that it’s smoke and mirrors.”

    Not smoke and mirrors; a reversal of the sex games that women play on men all the time. And trust me: it works like a charm! By withholding sex, you make a woman more intrigued by you. You cause her to want you more, by turning her natural curiosity and desire to control men back on her. Her #1 method of taking control of the relationship is using her pussy to subdue you. By you being in control of when YOU choose to have sex, you render her pussy control weapon ineffective. By the time you finally do give her the sex she craves…and she does crave it gents…she’ll know that she’s finally met her match. She knows she’s not dealing with a cunt thirsty pussy boy, waiting for the chain to fasten onto his neck. Man, I should patent this stuff and sell it in a bottle! Believe me; it works!

    “This argument sounds reminds me of feminists saying ‘Men do it all the time, but something’s wrong with a woman if she does it.’”

    Again: just restoring things to their natural order. No argument.

    “If you’ve studied a traditional culture where men controlled women by abstaining from sex and giving out sex and approval as a reward for good behavior I would love to hear about it.”

    We’re talking about one now: the pimp/ho culture; the world’s oldest profession. It works just fine in their society. Why wouldn’t it work in ours?

    “Older generations where? America? Traditionally men gained a sense of masculinity by protecting their families and providing for them. They had more legal control over their wives but they also had greater responsibility to them. Very few women could support families, and a breadwinner’s injury or illness frequently sent families to the poorhouse. Men who couldn’t or wouldn’t fulfill their masculine responsibilities to their families were not respected by their wives or other men. You may want more respect than most men get today but in America of previous generations no man was automatically assigned an adoring wife for being born with a Y chromosome. He earned his wife’s respect by working hard for their family. Alcoholics who couldn’t hold jobs weren’t respected, and no one was considered more cowardly or dishonorable than a man who deserted his wife and kids.”

    No argument there…

    “Does your grandmother clean the gutters while your grandpa watches the game?”
    No…she cooked his dinner, did his laundry, sewed patches in his clothes, kept the house sparkling clean…And he still managed to get those gutters cleaned out!

    “You’re a clever guy…”

    Thanks!

    ” …but it’s not clear whether you’re criticizing feminists who don’t respect traditional masculine men or traditional feminine women who expect masculine responsibility from men.”

    My ‘criticism’ is against traditional feminine women who have allowed themselves to be subverted by feminist ideology.Its also against the punked out men who enable this way of thinking to go unchallenged. Its prevalent throughout our culture. And its about time those house of cards got toppled, so we can go on and rebuild a truly healthy society.

    And speaking of my grandparents: my grandmother knew her place in the home. She never disrespected my grandfather or verbally attacked his manhood. She stayed in what was known as a woman’s place. And she was content in that role. She kept a clean well tended home; and she obviously never played the withholding sex game: they had 9 kids together! She had no problem playing 2nd fiddle to her husband. They were married for over 50 years. Both are deceased now. Grandma went first; my grandpop, who was healthy as an ox, just decided not to get out of bed about a week or so after grandma’s funeral. When we tried to get him to move on, his response was the same:
    “I’ve lived my life. I’ve raised my children. I want to go be with my wife”. He died exactly 2 months to the day of his wife. Thats how strong their love connection was. Damn…life was so simple back then…


  37. ====>
    And speaking of my grandparents: my grandmother knew her place in the home. She never disrespected my grandfather or verbally attacked his manhood. She stayed in what was known as a woman’s place. And she was content in that role. She kept a clean well tended home; and she obviously never played the withholding sex game: they had 9 kids together! She had no problem playing 2nd fiddle to her husband. They were married for over 50 years. Both are deceased now. Grandma went first; my grandpop, who was healthy as an ox, just decided not to get out of bed about a week or so after grandma’s funeral. When we tried to get him to move on, his response was the same:
    “I’ve lived my life. I’ve raised my children. I want to go be with my wife”. He died exactly 2 months to the day of his wife. Thats how strong their love connection was. Damn…life was so simple back then…

    ========================>

    That’s how man play smart and control the world. All women who act differently are doomed to shame and guilt.


  38. macmajii, calm the heck down. You sound almost rabid.

    Off topic, have any of you watch The Terminal? It’s a good movie imo. Maybe you can learn that in this world not everything is black and white. Male and female. Humans are versatile creatures. They can adapt to their surroundings.

    I don’t believe in traditional roles but I do believe you should live as honorably as possible. So I don’t support feminists who demean men and vice versa to chauvinist with women.


  39. Chauvinist: a convenient label to give any man who doesn’t buy into societal attempts at emasculating men. *My definition*

    So let me get this straight: I sound ‘almost rabid’ because I speak the truth? Is that correct? Typical.

    Whenever mislead, misinformed, Hollywood programmed women (and the nut-less men who love them) are called on the carpet about their double standards, they throw labels like chauvinist or angry man out there. Its a way of trying to discredit a valid point without addressing it head on. You offered nothing but your opinion of me. But you never addressed any of my points. There was no screaming or hollering on my part. Just simple typing of keys on a computer board, in a relaxed and thoughtful way.

    If anyone sounds ‘almost rabid’, I’m afraid it would be you. I’m always open for conversation, from just about anyone. Falsely labeling someone who’s opinions you don’t agree with is not only childish, it’s intellectually dishonest. Not to mention so… typical.

    Come with something more concrete…


  40. I read the book thanks to you; not bad; actually and unfortunately right on target; but sad for the author there are a few exceptions; very clever as well; A secret sweet victim of male; a real man knows better; trust me!:) your author is an acceptable whore and the women he dealt with are stupid! Think of this, all you write and present have to do with the physical realm, go one step ahead, try to merge the spiritual, with in the relationship, dive in, and write about it; versus giving us what animals do, you are still stuck in superficialities; make the male instinct work with the illusion of the female and then perhaps you will have an ounce of originality and value to share…!


  41. I think anybody who’s struggling to assert his or her dominance over another person is going to lose all of their energy and be a slave to either said enemy of the world itself. Best not to have enemies in the first place. I’m not saying you have to be affectionate to women, but you don’t have to resent them either. I hope what I’m writing makes sense… either way this entry is pretty old so it probably doesn’t matter.


  42. I swear that hot girls can get away with anything and everything. I’m just glad that all of them don’t know what kind of power they really yield!


  43. Thank you for those great articles.

    Yes I was wondering for a while if nature or some kind of nature matrix programs men to be sort of servant of women.
    The power of love as they say, you feel a tremendous emotionnal force that pushes you to take care, protect provide, and simply give as much as you can to the girl.

    For intsnce when I see a hight proportion of female very old women I ‘m like where is the husband ?
    You see here bying chocolates and food or being alone and then realise that at some point a man was providing for her and working and protecting and doing whatever he could for her.

    yes, sex is the picture and thats a strong drive but I ‘m wondering if there is not other aspects to all this like smply attachment, there have been study associating oxytosin ( hormone of love) with increased attachment for the object of romantic love.
    It is one of the tools used by the matrix to fulffil its own programming.

    The thing is it seems that this how humans are programmed and we can say I ‘m in control ; I decide , i ‘m in charge and so on.

    Maybe men who are avoiding this or this strong emotionnal drive might be because they are smart or….simply cowards.

    Now if that natural order is real as I guess it is assumed here then :

    Should/Could we go against the matrix ?

    If it is about freeing one (men) from the matrix then what do you guys propose as solutions ?

    What do you think of polyamory as one solution ?


  44. I forget to say in the last comment that you see old women having fun with their husband ‘ sinheritance while their husband is food for worms
    *
    but Aren’t we simply paranoid ?


  45. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related


  46. I, as a man, believe the future will be definitely for WOMEN. They are the future rulers. They dominated the men and everything!…


  47. I couldn’t DISAGREE with you more my friend! It will NEVER happen. Primarily because: 1. Women would come to hate being in control, which is one reason why so many are so unhappy today. Women in control of men is an unnatural phenomenon.

    2. Men would eventually rebel when dudes such as myself show them a much better alternative.

    Bottom line: you cannot rebel against your own nature for long. Doing so only leads to stress and misery.


  48. macmajji

    Just know that even submissiveness is used by some women as tool to get what they want.
    they say it themselves, that they PRACTICE to be submissive cose they know this is how the men is gonna give more and be more attentionate, affactive for her……

    Even if the men is in charge or control and everything they still know how to use “passive power”…….
    they lead you indirectly to do what they want….

    The thing is sthat some women will use this in purpose while some will not.


  49. I read the e-book and while I agreed with many of it, I feel that the author forgets to include the effect of competition between woman. He makes it sound like woman are all in cahoots to snare, capture, and enslave men for their own use.

    What do you think?


  50. I just finished this book. Jesus, this is the most succinct and frankly clear-thinking analysis of the feminist position I’ve ever read. Talk about no sacred cows: This guys sings it.

    Any woman who wishes to understand the male position on what women are like (and on what society demands of him) should read this book.

    And every man alive should read this book. I say this without the slightest bit of reservation at all. It has weaknesses, including its approach (probably not enough academic fakery in it, unlike most supposedly referenced feminist screeds).

    The summary on pages 119-124 re: feminism is, while simplistic, more or less completely accurate.

    Dammit, this is genius. It needs to be propagated and disseminated as widely as possible.

    Hats off to our Nigerian immigrant author.

  51. UltraMontane on May 27th, 2012 at 3:26 PM

    Anymore books like this? Not politically correct, but deep analysis of gender politics?


  52. UltraMontane,

    Try a book called “The Great Female Con.” it’s an ebook PDF you can buy and download if you just google that title.


  53. Brilliant. Thanks for hosting this book.

Leave a Reply